Monthly Archives: October, 2013

Oregon School Board Doing the Right Thing

The St. Helens School Board in Oregon lifted a ban that had prevented teachers with concealed carry permits from carrying their guns on campus.

School board chairman Marshall Porter said, “The current law in Oregon allows for anyone to concealed carry on school grounds. To exclude our staff seems like they’re being punished. They should have a right to protect themselves if they choose.”

This is a great call by the school board, and one that if there were an incident involving an active shooter, would save lives.  There are countless reports of shootings being stopped because of an armed presence.

I would like to see all schools in the country take a similar stand for the safety of students in the United States.

Speech from Senator Mike Lee

untitledThank you very much. It’s a privilege to be with you this morning at the Values Voter Summit.

I want to start this morning by telling you a story that I first heard from a man named Emo Phillips. He was walking across a bridge. It was late enough there was no automobile traffic on that bridge. In fact, there was no one on the bridge at all. So he was able to walk in the middle of the bridge. It was a high bridge. A bridge that stretched over a large river. It was high enough that anyone who fell off of that bridge would not survive the impact, even if they landed in the water.

He saw a man standing on the outside of the guardrail as if getting ready to jump. He knew based on the height of the bridge the man wouldn’t survive the fall and he surmised the man was contemplating ending his life. Determined not to allow this to happen, Emo stopped and engaged the man in conversation.

He asked first if the man were a believer, if he believed in God. The man said, yes. Emo said, me too. He said, are you a Christian? The man said, yes. Emo said, me too. He asked the man if he were a Baptist. The man said yes. Emo said, me too.

“Are you a northern Baptist or southern?” “I’m a northern Baptist.” “Me too!”

“Are you a northern fundamentalist Baptist or reformed Baptist?” “I’m a northern fundamentalist Baptist.” “Me too!”

“Are you a northern fundamental Baptist of conference 1812 or 1857?”

He said, “northern fundamental Baptist of conference 1857.”

And I said “Die heretic!,” and pushed him off the bridge!

As values voters we must remember that it is far more important to keep our eyes on potential conservative converts – rather than heretics. You see, the principles that unite us are also the principles that position us to win the hearts and minds of voters across the country.

Too often in this town we stop thinking about the things that matter most. We get so caught up in the thick of things that we not only stop thinking big – we often stop thinking at all – which leads to other things – like $17 trillion debt, widespread dysfunction, and much more.

To illustrate the point, I want to tell you a story about my boys. I’ve got twin boys, 18 years old, their names are James and John. These sons of thunder as I sometimes call them are good boys. They go to church, they read their scriptures, they are 4.0 students.

On this particular day we were listening to the radio in my car. We were listening to a song on the radio, a song we had heard many times, a song that I hadn’t listened to very carefully in the past.

All of a sudden for one particular reason or another, I started listening to the words this day. And I realized that these words were not necessarily good. They were not the words that any god-fearing father of teenage boys would want his kids hearing. All of a sudden I pointed out to them, this is a raunchy song, this is terrible. My son John without batting an eye said, “Dad, it’s not bad if you don’t think about it.” All of a sudden the horrific thought occurred to me, my son John must be advising the President of the United States!

You see, a $17 trillion debt isn’t bad, but only if you don’t think about it. Adding to that debt at a rate of a trillion dollars a year isn’t bad, if you don’t think about it. And a massive government takeover of our health care system isn’t bad if you don’t think about it.

If you do think about it, of course, all those things are horrible. If you do think about it, the very best argument against Obamacare is the president’s conduct during the first ten days of this shutdown. I mean, look what’s happened. The president is using the immense power of the federal government to hurt the American people. Why? In order to win a political argument. What happens then when we turn over some of the most private, intimate decisions in our lives, our health care system, to the government? When will that be used as a tool against us? We must stop it it, we must defund it, we cannot accept it.

You are here today because you ARE thinking about it.

The Republican Party is at its best when we are thinking about it. Unfortunately some people succumb to the notion that we can’t think deeply in the middle of big battles on heated issues. I say this is exactly what we should be doing – TODAY! And every day. Because when we stop and think we come back home to being the party of big ideas. Throughout our party’s history, the bigger our ideas, the more we have succeeded.

Ronald Reagan’s conservative revolution. The 1994 Contract with America. George W. Bush’s “compassionate conservatism.”

Whatever you might think of each of the above, they all showed in their time that it is ideas and principles – rather than personalities or interest groups – that unify the Republican Party and propel it to both electoral and governing success.

Lately we haven’t had much of either.

Some say it’s because we need better candidates. Some say we need a better message. Others say it’s a dispute about tactics and strategy, or technology.

And certainly they all play a part.

But to my mind, what the Party of Ideas is really missing… is the ideas. For too long, Republicans have put off the difficult work of developing a modernized, principled conservative reform agenda to meet many of the new challenges of the 21st century.

There are many reasons why this is so. But I think the biggest is that in this city, conservatives often fall into a trap – defining ourselves by what we are against

Big government… debt… higher taxes and regulations… oh and I almost forgot – Obamacare.

But we haven’t invested nearly as much time and energy in communicating what we conservatives are for.

I’m talking about more than simply the policies we advocate. Conservatism is not about the bills we want to pass, but the nation we want to be. As you know, for conservatives, politics is just a means, not an end. The real goal – what conservatives are really for – is not an agenda for government. It’s a vision of society. A view of the world we want to build, together.

Together. That word, “together,” is an essential – and too often overlooked – part of what we conservatives believe.

We’re all committed to bedrock principles of individual liberty, individual rights, and personal responsibility.

But the reason we fight for individual freedom is the strength, vitality, and value of the communities free individuals form.

The alternative to big government is not small government.

The alternative to big government is a thriving, flourishing nation of cooperative communities – where your success depends on your service.

It’s a free enterprise economy where everyone works for everyone else, competing to see who can figure out the best way to help the most people.

And it’s a voluntary civil society, where free individuals come together to meet each other’s needs, fill in the gaps, and make sure no one gets left behind.

Conservatism has never been a vision of isolated loners.

Ours is a vision of husbands and wives; parents and children; neighbors and neighborhoods; volunteers and congregations; bosses and employees; businesses and customers; clubs, teams, groups, associations and friends.

We conservatives don’t simply want smaller government – that’s not enough. We want bigger citizens, stronger neighborhoods, and more heroic communities.

We understand what liberals do not. That in America, freedom doesn’t mean “you’re on your own.” Freedom means “we’re all in this together.”

The value we place on communities based on the value we place on the first and most important human community of them all: the family. Conservatives have argued for years that the family must be at the core of our worldview.

On issues like school prayer, or the right to life, or traditional marriage, or home-schooling, conservatives have said protecting the family is the most important part of our moral agenda.

Today, some critics say that times have changed… and we have to change with them. They say we have to reach out to people beyond our conservative base. They say we have to change the way we think and talk about families. It may surprise some of you to hear… but I think they make a great point.

Times have changed. We do need to broaden our appeal, and change the way we think and talk about family.

But ultimately, the critics have it backwards. The problem is not that conservatives have focused too muchon the family — but far too little. For the rapid changes we have seen in recent years in America have only made the family more important, not less.

The family is the foundation not only of our society, but of our economy, our culture, and our democracy as well.

The family is indivisible from any facet of America’s history or destiny.

Crises like divorce, fatherlessness, and social isolation – while moral in nature – have enormous social and economic consequences.

In the same way, economic problems like unequal opportunity; stagnant wages; and the spiraling costs of housing, health care, and education represent moral threats to family stability… and national success.

Working families today are bearing the brunt of all of the above. And as a result, too many are falling behind.

Abraham Lincoln explained that the role of government should be for every citizen at every stage of life:

“…to lift artificial weights from all shoulders, to clear the paths of laudable pursuit for all, to afford all an unfettered start and a fair chance in the race of life.”

Lincoln’s insight offers an almost perfect distillation of what America – and the Republican Party, at its best – stand for: equal opportunity, for all, to pursue happiness.

Today, this fundamental American ideal is hanging by a thread.

Up and down American society – which used to be defined and driven by what Tocqueville called our “yearning desire to rise” – we find a new and unnatural stagnancy.

We find the underprivileged trapped in poverty, sometimes for generations.

We find the middle class caught on a treadmill, running harder every year just to maintain the economic security and social cohesion that were once taken for granted.

Meanwhile, at the top of our society, we find a political and economic elite that – having reached the highest rungs – has pulled up the ladder behind itself, denying others the chance even to climb.

From Wall Street to K Street to Pennsylvania Avenue, we find special interests increasingly exempted and insulated – by law – from the rigors of competition and the consequences of their own mistakes.

All of this points to what really is an inequality crisis in America today – a crisis not of unequal wealth or income… but unequal opportunity.

Progressives, from the president on down, say that inequality in America today is a failure of the free market… resulting from insufficient government intervention.

But if you look closely, you start to notice… the opposite is true.

Today, many of Lincoln’s “artificial weights” and obstacles blocking his “paths of laudable pursuit” are themselves dysfunctional government policies.

It is government policies, after all, that trap poor children in rotten schools; poor families in broken neighborhoods; that penalize single parents for getting raises, or getting married.

It is government policies that inflate costs and limit access to quality schools and health care; that hamstring badly needed innovation in higher education; and penalize parents’ investment in their children.

This opportunity crisis is absolutely real – sadly it is just as real as the liberals’ flawed, seductive, big-government proposals to create their version of opportunity.

It is not enough for us simply to oppose liberals’ ideas. We have to propose conservative ones.

True victory for values voters may be found a little ways down on that road less traveled, but it’s long past time for conservatives to take it. Our movement is at its best when we take on big challenges.

And the great challenge of our time is the challenge of the forgotten family: the honest, noble parents across the country trying to make ends meet in a society, economy, and democracy increasingly rigged by Washington against them and their children.

It is time for a new conservative reform agenda that levels the playing field and finally meets the challenges facing working families:

  • to give underprivileged families a fair chance to work their way into the middle class;
  • to give families struggling to stay in middle class their fair chance to make a good living and build a good life;
  • to make it easier for couples for start families… for entrepreneurs to start businesses… and volunteers to start civic and charitable organizations;
  • to help all Americans at every step along the path to success overcome the obstacles big government has put before them.

It is time for a new approach to taxes, to not only lower rates to spur economic opportunity, but to eliminate tax discrimination against parents and families. I am working on a bill designed to do just that.

It is time for a new approach to education, to break up the special-interest cartels that hold back our young children, and our young adults. Education is opportunity, and government has no business telling students where they can and can’t go to get it.

It is time for a new approach to transportation. New roads mean new neighborhoods, new communities, new jobs, new families, and new opportunities.

Yet today, infrastructure money states could be spending on those opportunities, Washington instead spends on bureaucratic waste and special-interest giveaways.

It is time to rethink a dysfunctional welfare system that holds poor families down. And to reform a corrupt corporate welfare system that props big businesses up.

We need to find new ways – conservative ways that rely on free enterprise and civil society — to help young couples:

  • get married,
  • afford a home,
  • raise and educate their kids,
  • get good health care,
  • take care of their elderly parents,
  • and retire with security themselves.

Our movement has always identified with those Americans who through hard work and determination have climbed the ladder of success. And we always should.

But our ideals demand we identify even more with those Americans still on the bottom rungs, where the climbing is harder, dangerous, and lonely.

We need to stand up for those Americans no one else will:

  • for the unborn child in the womb;
  • for the poor student caught in the failing school;
  • for the reformed father languishing in prison and the fatherless son facing alone the dangers of the street;
  • for the single mom working two jobs but still ensnared in big-government poverty traps;
  • for the elderly and the disabled, dehumanized by bureaucracy;
  • and for the splintering neighborhoods that desperately need them all.

These families, these moms and dads and grandparents and kids: they’re waiting for us.

They know more government isn’t the answer. They know government only divides them.

But they also know that too often… our party has ignored them.

That has to change.

And it has to change today… right now… because every hour, every day, big government leaves more and more American families behind.

It is time for conservatives to remember those forgotten families. In word and deed, in our hearts and in our agenda.

It is time to remember that the most audacious entrepreneurs in America are not high-tech CEOs in Silicon Valley… they’re a young couple at a church back home, saying “I do.”

It is time to remember that the most important investments in our nation’s future are not issued on Wall Street… but are sleeping in their mothers’ arms at the maternity unit of your local hospital.

To be truly pro-growth and pro-opportunity, our agenda must be truly pro-family.

Not just on some issues, but all of them.

I believe if conservatives look anew at the challenges facing the family, we will quickly discover opportunities to meet – united and undaunted – the challenges facing our movement… our economy… and our nation.

Building a new conservative agenda of reform around these moms and dads and kids – remembering America’s values and especially America’s forgotten families – is the path to restoring the greatness of our nation.

And if – at long last – conservatives finally take that road less traveled, it will make all the difference.

Thank you for everything you do. Keep the faith. And may God bless you all.

Threats of Default are Invalid

The Constitution of the United States of America, Amendment XIV, Section 4:

The validity of the public debt of the United States, authorized by law, including debts incurred for payment of pensions and bounties for services in suppressing insurrection or rebellion, shall not be questioned. But neither the United States nor any State shall assume or pay any debt or obligation incurred in aid of insurrection or rebellion against the United States, or any claim for loss or emancipation of any slave; but all such debts, obligations and claims shall be held illegal and void.

Once again, the excessive spending performed by the Federal government brings our nation to the end of the debt limit, which was written and passed into law the last time the excessive spending brought us to the end of the debt limit. This is an endless cycle of our Federal politicians demonstrating their gamesmanship over the funding of the government, with arguments over this program and that, the fraudulent whoops of victory whenever spending cuts are made … because there never are any spending cuts, no minuses in spending, only decreases in proposed future increases that have yet to occur.

Constitutionally, our debts must be paid first, before anything else.  One really great way to ensure this, would be to decrease the amount of rampant spending this government approves.  Too many in the capital, Democrats and Republicans, are afraid of doing this because they don’t want to lose their precious seats and positions.

They don’t want to do what is right because they are mostly cowards, only willing to nibble at the edges of the problems, not do the right thing.

It’s time to find men and women who aren’t afraid, and that may mean going against the two party system.  The status quo is destroying our nation.  When will we stand up for the generations of Americans yet to be born?


Where Cuts Should Come before Not Paying Troops/Vets

wpid-congress.pngThe President has threatened to cut troop pay, social security payments, veterans benefits, etc. if he doesn’t get his way on the debt ceiling.

Let me show you some math on where money should be cut before EVER removing pay from those who need it most:

Presidential Salary: $400,000
Vice President Salary: $231,900
Rank and file Senators and Congressmen (x430): $174,000
Speaker of the House: $223,500
Senate & House Majority/Minority leaders (x4): $193,400
Chief Justice: $223,500
Supreme Court Justices (x8): $213,900
Homeland Security Czar: $172,400
Energy Czar: $172,200
Urban Affairs Czar: $158,000
Health Czar: $185,500

There are over 40 more czar positions I was unable to confirm. For math purposes, we’ll estimate that they are 150,000.

White House Staffer salary (only included cabinet/advisers) and I was only able to make it through half the list before having to take care of my kids: $14,810.170. Those are only advisers and cabinet level officials, and all range and 100k or more.

Just with that the grand total ends up being: $93,881,970 or nearly 100 MILLION DOLLARS.

Bear in mind I was only able to tabulate HALF of the presidential staff salary. I say that their pay goes before a single veteran or service member has to lose theirs.

And before you touch ONE SINGLE DIME of a disabled veteran, or enlisted service member, you get rid of the GENERALS’ pay first. They make almost 200k per year, while a private makes around 19k.

Go ahead and challenge me on my numbers too. I got the information from the CBO and White House websites.

This is not ok, and the president should be impeached if he refuses to pay our military, vets, or elderly.

The Unaffordable Care Act

Obamacare_NO_01_280x271A few years ago President Obama appeared on television and told the American public he was going to give them the ultimate free lunch – he said his new Affordable Care Act (ACA) would not only cover 30 million uninsured people, but also reduce the cost of insurance premiums for the typical American family by $2,500. The reality is worse.

One of the latest articles in Forbes Magazine states that Obamacare will actually increase Healthcare spending for a typical family of four by $7,450. In that same article, it is mentioned that the experts working for Medicare’s actuary have again reported that in its first 10 years, Obamacare will boost health spending by “roughly $621 billion” above the amounts Americans would have spent without this misguided law.

The ACA is mainly a set of regulations imposed on health insurers, employers, and our citizens. Very little, if anything, has been done to reduce the cost of medical care, which is the main cost-driver of health insurance premiums.

On Jan. 1, 2014, the following mandates on health insurers become effective:

Guaranteed Issue: Health insurance is meant to be underwritten. It is a risk-based product. What has been overlooked by ACA’s regulations is the reserve requirements health insurers must have for incurred and future claims. Guaranteed issue will increase claims. Higher claims require increased reserves. Beginning next year, health insurers can no longer underwrite a risk. They will have no choice but to increase premiums significantly. Guaranteed issue was tried in the individual health insurance market in 1995. The result was major increase in premiums. The mandate was eventually rescinded.

Waiver of Pre-existing conditions: Again, another method to limit exposure, which helps keep premiums lower. The maximum pre-x period is 12 months. This provision will be eliminated by ACA. This becomes another high cost issue for insurers, which impacts claims paid, thus increasing reserve requirements.

Community Rating: Does away with normal demographic rating. Gender is eliminated. Limits maximum premium on older insured’s (65). The limit is three times the rate charged for a 20 year old. This will cause premiums for the under 30 age group to increase by 30%. Premiums for employers with 2-49 employees will be per employee “age” based. No longer will average premiums be used.

Exchange Navigators: These enrollers are not required to have a health insurance license. They will be marketing health insurance but not licensed as agents and brokers are. They are not required to have taken ethics courses – no CE requirements or errors and omissions insurance. The PUBLIC BEWARE.

Obamacare Group Exchanges: Employees eligible for an employer’s plan are not eligible for exchange enrollment. Dependents who do not enroll in their spouse’s employer medical plan are not eligible to enroll in an exchange. By 2015, exchange medical carries face premium increases. Penalty for not Having Health Insurance: Minimum $95 annual fine to a maximum of 1% of income. Can only be collected if a refund is due. Young persons facing premium increases will opt for the fine and walk away. (Where does that leave the older people depending on their financial input into the system?)

These are all part of what will drive up premiums. It is unaffordable, and frankly, immoral.

Shutdown Could Halt VA Checks by November

Department of Veterans Affairs Secretary Eric Shinseki told lawmakers on Wednesday that millions of veterans, their dependents, or survivors relying on VA compensation and support will not receive their checks next month if the ongoing government shutdown stretches into late October.

“Effective 1 November, if we don’t resolve this, [disabled] veterans will not receive pension compensation,” Shinseki told the House Veterans Affairs Committee. “For veterans at school, their education checks, vocational rehab … There are 3.8 million veterans, and when you add their survivors, spouses and children, it’s over 5 million individuals involved.”

“I’m hoping the leadership of this committee will help us resolve it,” he said.

Shinseki said there was no ready plan on hand as there had not been a shutdown since 1995. At that time, VA and the Defense Department were exempted from the shutdown, officials said.

Since the Democrats in the White House and Senate want to keep playing games, our veterans will suffer. The Republicans tried compromising many times, but the President and Senate would have nothing to do with it.

Medal of Honor Recepient Dies

imagesIt is sad to hear that one of our nation’s finest heroes has passed away.  I took the following story from  We honor his memory.

The Army and the nation are mourning the passing of World War II veteran and Medal of Honor recipient Nicholas Oresko, who died Oct. 4. He was 96 years old.

 Oresko, who was a master sergeant, had been the oldest living Medal of Honor recipient at the time of his passing. He received the nation’s highest military decoration Oct. 12, 1945.
Sgt. Maj. of the Army Raymond F. Chandler III said the nation has lost a hero.
“I join the family and friends of former Master Sgt. Nicholas Oresko who grieve at the loss of our nation’s oldest recipient of the Medal of Honor,” he said.
Chandler praised the bravery of Oresko.
“As his (Medal of Honor) citation states, ‘his quick thinking, indomitable courage, and unswerving devotion’ on Jan. 23, 1945, saved the lives of many of his fellow Soldiers and allowed his unit to accomplish its mission,” said Chandler.
“Thank you, Nicholas, for your lesson in personal courage and selfless service,” said Chandler.
Oresko, who had received an outpouring of love and support from the community, was surrounded by veterans and current military members in his final days. Some service members reportedly stood watch at his bedside after Oresko was admitted to a New Jersey hospital where he died due to complications from surgery.
His wife passed away in 1980 and his son died in 2010. He will be buried in New Jersey with full military honors.
Oresko is a hero in his hometown, Bayonne, N.J., where a school is named after him, according to the mayor’s office.
“One of the best things I ever had the great opportunity to do was to name a school after Nicholas Oresko while he was still with us. May his courage continue to inspire all of us,” said Bayonne Mayor Mark A. Smith.
Oresko made his hometown proud and represented the patriotism of the community so well, said Smith.
“Nicholas Oresko showed uncommon bravery, carrying out two one-man attacks on German bunkers,” he said. “Although he was wounded, he refused to leave the battlefield until his mission was accomplished.”
His outstanding heroism and courage helped defeat Nazi Germany, and his actions will stand as a great example for future generations, said Smith.
In the Battle of the Bulge, Oresko “swiftly worked ahead alone” after “deadly automatic fire from the flanks pinned down his unit” near Tettingen, Germany, Jan. 23, 1945, according to his Medal of Honor citation.
Oresko, a platoon sergeant with Company C, 302nd Infantry Regiment, 94th Infantry Division, 3rd Army, moved through the gunfire and then threw a grenade into a German position, rushed the bunker and killed all the hostile occupants who survived the grenade blast, it said.
He then, according to the citation, continued the assault after he was wounded in machinegun fire.
“As withering machinegun and rifle fire swept the area, he struck out alone in advance of his men to a second bunker,” the citation states.
“With a grenade, he crippled the dug-in machinegun defending this position and then wiped out the troops manning it with his rifle, completing his second self-imposed, one-man attack.”
Oresko, with “quick thinking, indomitable courage, and unswerving devotion to the attack in the face of bitter resistance and while wounded,” killed 12 Germans, prevented a delay in the assault, and made it possible for Company C to obtain its objective with minimum casualties, according to the citation.
Oresko received the Medal of Honor in a White House ceremony with 14 other members of the armed forces, according to the Harry S. Truman Library and Museum.
“It is the greatest honor that can come to a man. It is an honor that all of us strive for, but very few of us ever achieve,” said President Harry S. Truman in bestowing the award, states the transcript from the presidential library and museum.

Pressure Mounts for Sebelius to Resign

Health and Human Services (HHS) Secretary Kathleen Sebelius is coming under fire to resign in the wake of a two-week Obamacare roll out that CBS News calls “nothing short of disastrous.”

In a surprising development, Sebelius’s longtime friend and fellow Kansan, Sen. Pat Roberts (R-KS), has gone on record as the first Republican calling for Sebelius’s ouster.

“Americans are tired of the Sebelius spin,” said Roberts. “They can see Obamacare has failed them. We need a secretary who can admit when enough is enough.”

Criticism of Sebelius’s management of the Obamacare launch has intensified in the wake of a blistering interview last week with fellow progressive Jon Stewart of The Daily Show. Stewart asked Sebelius numerous times why President Barack Obama has given big businesses a one-year Obamacare waiver but not everyday Americans. Sebelius refused to answer.

My question is, why stop at just Secretary Sebelius? Everyone involved in the implementation of Obamacare should resign. Everyone who voted for it. Everyone who penned the regulations within it. Everyone who signed on and refused to fight against it.

This “law” is not good for the American people, and I am tired of socialism being crammed down our throats. Socialism has failed in every way, no matter how nice it sounds on paper. The fact of the matter is, there aren’t enough people to produce for those who refuse. This law is communism, and it will kill our nation.

NSA Given Green Light

nsamgnonlineThe National Security Agency has gotten the green light to continue its controversial collection of U.S. phone call records.

The Foreign Intelligence Surveillance Court authorized the program for limited time periods — with a requirement that the government submit new requests every several weeks, The Hill reported Friday.

The Office of the Director of National Intelligence announced the court’s approval in a statement late Friday.

The phone record snooping — first revealed in leaks by Edward Snowden — generated criticism from privacy advocates and some lawmakers, who are concerned the collection affects millions of Americans who aren’t suspected of any wrongdoing.

When are we going to be able to get rid of this monstrosity? When will people wake up and see the tyranny breathing right now in our nation’s capital?

It is time that this program is removed. There is no reason to collect data on every American citizen. We are supposed to be guaranteed rights from our government, but for a long time, it appears the Constitution has fallen to the wayside.

That is why we must all start looking for the men and women who will stand up to this tyranny and get them elected. This is probably going to take some time to seek the candidates, and it will involve getting rid of nearly all incumbents who have not only allowed for this to happen, but also defend it in many cases. This must be repealed.

Will There Be Prosecution?

There was a disturbing story we learned of, where there was a glitch in the EBT card system (food stamps). Essentially there was no limit placed for residents in the Springhill and Mansfield, Louisiana area. I seems that quite a few people took advantage of the situation at taxpayer expense,

KSLA News 12 Shreveport, Louisiana News Weather

So we are left wondering. Will these thieves be prosecuted?